Endorsed midwives prescribing scheduled medicines in Australia: A scoping review.

PROBLEM: Despite 10 years of prescribing scheduled medicines by Endorsed Midwives, little is known about prescribing practices. BACKGROUND: Endorsed Midwives can prescribe scheduled medicines and have access to Medicare rebates to support service provision. Endorsed Midwives have the potential to improve access to medications for women, however, are met with barriers, including inconsistencies in state and national legislation. AIM: To search for what is published regarding Endorsed Midwife prescribing of scheduled medicines in Australia, report on the literature, synthesise the findings and discuss the results. METHODS: A scoping review utilising the Joanna Brigg's Institute methodology. A search of CINAHL, PubMed, Science Direct and Medline databases was conducted. Seven peer-reviewed articles were identified; three discussion papers, one literature review and three research papers, published between 2016 and 2023 in English. Qualitative content analysis was used to identify topic areas. FINDINGS: Four topic areas were identified: 1) Endorsed Midwives increase women's access to prescribed medications; 2) the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme is restrictive and diminishes midwifery prescribing; 3) medication prescribing depends on internal and external structures; 4) professional relationships support prescribing. DISCUSSION: The authority to prescribe augments Endorsed Midwives' practice, improves timely access to medications and enhances role satisfaction. The effective use of midwifery prescribing is hampered by barriers such as the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme, inappropriate medication formularies, and poorly designed health service policy. CONCLUSION: To fully utilise Endorsed Midwife prescribing in all settings of maternity care, further work is required to develop education, remove barriers, and demonstrate the safety and effectiveness of midwifery prescribing.

Women's experiences of online antenatal education: An integrative literature review.

AIM: To identify what is currently known about how women experience online antenatal education. DESIGN: Integrative literature review. REVIEW METHODS: This integrative review applied the five-stage methodological framework outlined by Whittemore and Knafl (2005), supporting rigour in problem identification, selection and critical appraisal of quality literature, data analysis and synthesis of findings. DATA SOURCES: A literature search was conducted in May/June 2022, utilizing databases including OVID Embase, CINAHL, Joanna Briggs Institute EBP database, Nursing and Allied Health database, Wiley Online Library, Google scholar search engine and related reference lists. The search was limited to English language and primary research articles published in the last 10-year period (2012-2022). RESULTS: 12 articles met inclusion criteria. Three primary themes were identified: Comprehensibility: Looking back - understanding women's needs and preferences; Manageability: In the moment - flexibility versus social connection; and Meaningfulness & sustainability: Looking forward - the future of digital maternity education. CONCLUSION: Findings identified a marked digital divide for women accessing online antenatal education, placing vulnerable women at risk of continuing inequity. E-health literacy frameworks need to be implemented to create genuine accessibility, comprehensibility and cultural responsiveness to best meet the needs of users. IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION AND/OR HEALTH CARE CONSUMER: As digital health is an emerging field, there is strong evidence that online antenatal education requires further evaluation to better meet the needs of pregnant women and their support people. Enhancing digital health literacy for health professionals will also promote a greater understanding for how to uphold and support the socio-technical dimensions of online service delivery. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: There were no patient or public contributions as part of this integrative review of the literature.

Digital transformation of antenatal education: A descriptive exploratory study of women's experiences of online antenatal education.

PROBLEM: Research on how women experience online antenatal education is currently limited. A more nuanced understanding may assist organisations to tailor future digitalisation that best meets the needs of users. BACKGROUND: COVID-19 emergency measures forced a rapid implementation of online antenatal education. Women are known to enjoy some aspects of online antenatal education, but still desire social interaction. A marked digital divide is evident for more vulnerable populations. AIM: To explore how pregnant women experience an online antenatal education program. METHODS: A descriptive exploratory study was undertaken through collection of two concurrent data-sets. Quantitative data was collected from the online Parent Education Feedback Form (n = 38) Based on the six-stage process of Braun & Clarke, reflexive thematic analysis was used to analyse data sourced from semi-structured interviews with women (n = 5) who had undertaken online antenatal education. FINDINGS: Four themes, and eight associated sub-themes, were identified to better understand how women experience online antenatal education. The four primary themes identified were: Experiential Digital Learning; Desired Journey; Contemporary Representation; and Human Connection in the Digital Age. DISCUSSION: Well-designed digital platforms provide opportunities for interaction, content personalisation and self-tailored approaches in online antenatal education. Women require caregivers who hold specialist digital capabilities. Further research is warranted to better understand how digitalisation of antenatal education impacts women disadvantaged by digital exclusion. CONCLUSION: The digital transformation of antenatal education impacts a vast array of factors in women's experiences during pregnancy. A specialist skill-set from midwives is needed to champion quality antenatal education in the digital age.

An exploratory study of women and midwives' perceptions of environmental waste management - homebirth as climate action.

BACKGROUND: Inspired by observing midwives working with birthing women in Bali and at homebirths in Australia, this study explores the meanings associated with environmental waste at birth. AIMS: The aim is to better understand how and why women and midwives from the homebirth community in Australia choose to manage waste generated during the birthing process. Babies across the globe are born without a carbon footprint and are united, no matter their location, by a future that will require an understanding of and action against climate change. METHODS: This qualitative exploratory study investigated midwives' (n = 10) and women's (n = 10) perspectives on environmental waste generated from birth at home. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews and analysed thematically. RESULTS: Three overarching themes were identified from the data. The first theme "There is minimal waste from birth at home" demonstrates participants' perception of the difference in waste generated by birth at home compared to birth in a hospital. The second theme, "Organic waste from homebirth is beneficial to the environment," spoke to participants' embeddedness and connections within their surrounding community environment. The third theme, "Formal education around managing waste at homebirth doesn't exist," indicates a lack of structured or official education or training programs available to individuals interested in learning about sustainable waste management practices during home birth. CONCLUSION: Birthing at home has a low environmental impact as clinical waste is negligible. This research demonstrates a need to incorporate sustainable waste management into midwifery education while respecting midwifery practices in the home setting.

The role of part-time arrangements in the sustainability of midwifery continuity of care models in Australia: An integrative review.

INTRODUCTION: International maternity care experts have called for expanding midwiferyled continuity of care (MCoC) models. However, the number of models need augmentation as the number of women receiving this care is small. The majority of the midwifery workforce in Australian public health systems comprises women who work part-time. This aspect of the midwifery workforce demands careful consideration when attempting to change a maternity care system and sustain new models of care. Sparse research has been undertaken to explore whether part-time factors could play a role in the growth and sustainability of MCoC in Australia. This integrative review aims to analyze the role of parttime practice arrangements in the sustainability of MCoC models in Australia. METHODS: Following a systematic search of research databases (CINAHL, ScienceDirect, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Proquest) and screening the literature with eligibility criteria including keywords related to midwifery continuity of care, workforce arrangements and full-time equivalent (FTE), eight Australian research articles were identified for evaluation. The articles were appraised for bias using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) and data were analyzed using an integrated convergent narrative synthesis method. RESULTS: The resulting themes from the synthesis suggest that part-time MCoC roles may support the sustainability of the MCoC workforce without reducing quality of care to women. In various studies, midwives reported that FTE (full-time equivalent) of 0.5 may not meet the job's demands. However, this is likely influenced by local context and caseload size rather than the quantum of each midwife's FTE. The quality of the studies is limited due to the small scale of the studies; however, the qualitative results give a depth of understanding to the strengths and challenges that part-time arrangements in MCoC add to the midwifery workforce. CONCLUSIONS: This review recommends that part-time arrangements in MCoC models in Australia be evaluated in conjunction with other routinely analyzed workforce data. Further considerations should be made by midwifery managers, leaders, stakeholders, and decision makers responsible for developing and supporting part-time job arrangements in caseload models of care in Australia.

Development and testing of the Midwifery Perceptions and Assessment of Clinical Teaching (MidPaACT) tool.

OBJECTIVE: Develop and test a tool to measure midwives' perceptions of their role in preceptoring midwifery students. DESIGN: A multi method exploratory study design was used. POPULATION: Preceptor midwives from three maternity units in south-east Queensland Australia. METHODS: A three-phase process was used: item generation; expert review; psychometric testing including content analysis of qualitative responses. The survey was online or paper-based and included demographic details, the Clinical Preceptor Experience Evaluation Tool (CPEET) role subscale and draft tool. A focus group discussion explored the open-ended responses. FINDINGS: A large sample of preceptors (n = 164, 64.2 % response rate) participated. Factor analysis revealed a two-factor structure with 24 items accounting for 40.2 % of variance. The mean total score of the Midwifery Perceptions and Assessment of Clinical Teaching (MidPaACT) tool was 103.31 (SD = 9.47). The scale was reliable (Cronbach's alpha 0.89) and valid. Test-retest reliability showed moderate to excellent temporal stability across the scale and subscales. Measures of concurrent validity showed little agreement with the CPEET tool. Qualitative analysis revealed the way midwives were taught as students had a powerful influence on their approach to teaching in practice. CONCLUSION: This tool is specifically designed to assess midwifery preceptors' perceptions of their role in student learning in practice. Psychometric testing of the MidPaACT tool confirms its reliability and validity. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Midwifery preceptors are a key influence on the development of students' capability as a midwife. Midwives' perceptions of their proficiency in student learning are under-reported. The MidPaACT tool provides a reliable and valid means of measuring preceptors' perceptions and identifying areas for future educational and workforce improvement.

Inclusion and exclusion criteria for publicly-funded homebirth in Australia: A scoping review.

BACKGROUND: There are fifteen publicly-funded homebirth programs currently operating in Australia. Suitability for these programs is determined by a series of inclusion and exclusion criteria. AIM: The aim of this scoping review is to identify common inclusion and exclusion criteria for publicly-funded homebirth programs and other related factors that affect access to these programs. METHODS: A Google search was conducted for publicly-funded homebirth programs listed on the National Publicly-funded Homebirth Consortium website. Public websites, documents, and policies were analysed to identify inclusion and exclusion criteria for these programs. FINDINGS: Eleven of the 15 publicly-funded homebirth programs mention the availability of homebirth on their health service website, with varying levels of information about the inclusion and exclusion criteria available. Two of the programs with no information on their health service website are covered by a state-wide guideline. Additional details were sought directly from programs and obtaining further information from some individual homebirth programs was challenging. Variation in inclusion and exclusion criteria exists between programs. Common areas of variation include restrictions relating to Body Mass Index, parity, age, English language ability, tests required during pregnancy, and gestation at booking to the homebirth program. CONCLUSION: The inclusion and exclusion criteria for a publicly-funded homebirth program determines women's access to the program. Limited publicly available information regarding inclusion and exclusion criteria for many publicly-funded homebirth programs is likely to limit women's awareness of and access to these programs.

Women's perceptions of inclusion and exclusion criteria for publicly-funded homebirth - A survey.

BACKGROUND: There are 15 publicly-funded homebirth programs in Australia. Women's access to these programs is determined by program specific inclusion and exclusion criteria. AIMS: To examine women's perception of inclusion and exclusion criteria for publicly-funded homebirth programs in Australia and how these perceptions may influence women's choices and access to these programs. METHODS: A national online survey was conducted and promoted through social media networks to women interested in homebirth in Australia. Quantitative data were analysed to generate descriptive statistics and a content analysis was performed on qualitative data. FINDINGS: A total of 830 surveys were collected. Most women were supportive of inclusion and exclusion criteria related to social and environmental factors, although there was ambivalence about requiring ambulance cover, not having a history of domestic violence in the current relationship and requiring the woman to speak basic English. With regards to obstetric factors, only a requirement for labour to commence spontaneously at term was supported by over half of participants. All other obstetric related criteria had over half of participants disagreeing or strongly disagreeing that they should be used to prevent a woman from birthing at home. A desire for choice and access was frequently mentioned in the qualitative data. CONCLUSION: There is a need to address the lack of choice many women experience when pregnant and the lack of equitable access to affordable homebirth services in Australia.

Differential access to continuity of midwifery care in Queensland, Australia.

Objective To determine maternal access to continuity of midwifery care in public maternity hospitals across the state of Queensland, Australia. Methods Maternal access to continuity of midwifery care in Queensland was modelled by considering the proportion of midwives publicly employed to provide continuity of midwifery care alongside 2017 birth data for Queensland Hospital and Health Services. The model assumed an average caseload per full-time equivalent midwife working in continuity of care with 35 women per annum, based on state Nursing and Midwifery Award conditions. Hospitals were grouped into five clusters using standard Australian hospital classifications. Results Twenty-seven facilities (out of 39, 69%) across all 15 hospital and health services in Queensland providing a maternity service offered continuity of midwifery care in 2017 (birthing onsite). Modelling applying the assumed caseload of 35 women per full-time equivalent midwife found wide variations in the percentage of women able to access continuity of midwifery care, with access available for an estimated 18% of childbearing women across the state. Hospital classifications with higher clinical services capability and birth volume did not equate with higher access to continuity of midwifery care in metropolitan areas. Regional health services with level 3 district hospitals assisting with <500 births showed higher levels of access, potentially due to additional challenges to meet local population needs to those of a metropolitan service. Access to full continuity of midwifery care in level 3 remote hospitals (<500 births) was artificially inflated due to planned pre-labour transfers for women requiring specialised intrapartum care and women who planned to birth at other hospitals. Conclusions Despite strong evidence that continuity of midwifery care offers optimal care for women and their babies, there was significant variation in implementation and scale-up of these models across hospital jurisdictions. What is known about the topic? Access to continuity of midwifery care for pregnant women within the public health system varies widely; however, access variation among different hospital classification groups in Australian states and territories has not been systematically mapped. What does this paper add? This paper identified differential access to continuity of midwifery care among hospital classifications grouped for clinical services capability and birth volume in one state, Queensland. It shows that higher clinical services capability and birth volume did not equate with higher access to continuity of midwifery care in metropolitan areas. What are the implications for practitioners Scaling up continuity of midwifery care among all hospital classification groups in Queensland remains an important public health strategy to address equitable service access.

Self-efficacy, support and sustainability - a qualitative study of the experience of establishing breastfeeding for first-time Australian mothers following early discharge.

BACKGROUND: Ensuring women receive optimal breastfeeding support is of key importance to the health of mothers and their infants. Early discharge within 24 h of birth is increasingly common across Australia, and the practice of postnatal home visiting varies between settings. The reduction in length of stay without expansion of home visits reduces midwives' ability to support breastfeeding. The impact of early discharge on first-time mothers establishing breastfeeding was unknown. The study aim was to understand the experiences of first-time Australian mothers establishing breastfeeding when discharged from the hospital within 24 h of a normal vaginal birth. METHODS: A qualitative interpretive method was used. Semi-structured interviews with 12 women following early discharge were conducted. Data were audio recorded, professionally transcribed, and subjected to a thematic analysis. RESULTS: Three interconnected themes of 'self-efficacy', 'support' and 'sustainability' were identified. Self-efficacy influenced the women's readiness and motivation to be discharged home early and played a role in how some of the mothers overcame breastfeeding challenges. Social, semi-professional and professional breastfeeding supports were key in women's experiences. Sustainability referred to and describes what women valued in relation to continuation of their breastfeeding journey. CONCLUSION: This study found accessible people-based breastfeeding services in the community are valued following early discharge. Furthermore, there is demand for more evidence-based breastfeeding educational resources, potentially in the form of interactive applications or websites. Additionally, a focus on holistic and individualised breastfeeding assessment and care plans prior to discharge that link women with ongoing breastfeeding services is paramount.

Cost of maternity care to public hospitals: a first 1000-days perspective from Queensland.

Objective This study sought to compare costs for women giving birth in different public hospital services across Queensland and their babies. Methods A whole-of-population linked administrative dataset was used containing all health service use in a public hospital in Queensland for women who gave birth between 1 July 2012 and 30 June 2015 and their babies. Generalised linear models were used to compare costs over the first 1000 days between hospital and health services. Results The mean unadjusted cost for each woman and her baby (n = 134910) was A$17406 in the first 1000 days. After adjusting for clinical and demographic factors and birth type, women and their babies who birthed in the Cairns Hospital and Health Service (HHS) had costs 19% lower than those who birthed in Gold Coast HHS (95% confidence interval (CI) -32%, -4%); women and their babies who birthed at the Mater public hospitals had costs 28% higher than those who birthed at Gold Coast HHS (95% CI 8, 51). Conclusions There was considerable variation in costs between hospital and health services in Queensland for the costs of delivering maternity care. Cost needs to be considered as an important additional element of monitoring programs. What is known about the topic? The Australian maternal care system delivers high-quality, safe care to Australian mothers. However, this comes at a considerable financial cost to the Australian public health system. It is known that there are variations in the cost of care depending upon the model of care a woman receives, and the type of delivery she has, with higher-cost treatment not necessarily being safer or producing better outcomes. What does this paper add? This paper compares the cost of delivering a full cycle of maternity care to a woman at different HHSs across Queensland. It demonstrates that there is considerable variation in cost across HHSs, even after adjusting for clinical and demographic factors. What are the implications for practitioners? Reporting of cost should be an ongoing part of performance monitoring in public hospital maternity care alongside clinical outcomes to ensure the sustainability of the high-quality maternal health care Australian public hospitals deliver.

Cost-effectiveness of continuity of midwifery care for women with complex pregnancy: a structured review of the literature.

BACKGROUND: Critical evaluation of the cost-effectiveness and clinical effectiveness of continuity of midwifery care models for women experiencing complex pregnancy is an important consideration in the review and reform of maternity services. Most studies either focus on women who experience healthy pregnancy or mixed risk samples. These results may not be generalised across the childbearing continuum to women with risk factors. This review critically evaluates studies that measure the cost of care for women with complex pregnancies, with a focus on method and quality. AIMS / OBJECTIVES: To critically appraise and summarise the evidence relating to the combined cost-effectiveness, resource use and clinical effectiveness of midwifery continuity models for women who experience complex pregnancies and their babies in developed countries. DESIGN: Structured review of the literature utilising a matrix method to critique the methods and quality of studies. METHOD: A search of Medline, CINAHL, MIDIRS, DARE, EMBASE, OVID, PubMed, ProQuest, Informit, Science Direct, Cochrane Library, NHS Economic Evaluation Database (NHSEED) for the years 1994 - 2018 was conducted. RESULTS: Nine articles met the inclusion criteria. The review identified four areas of economic evaluation that related to women who experienced complex pregnancy and continuity of midwifery care. (1) cost and clinical effectiveness comparisons between continuity of midwifery care versus obstetric-led units; (2) cost of continuity of midwifery care and/or team midwifery compared to Standard Care; (3) cost-effectiveness of continuity of midwifery care for Australian Aboriginal women versus standard care; (4) patterns of antenatal care for women of high obstetric risk and comparative provider cost. Cost savings specific to women from high risk samples who received continuity of midwifery care compared with obstetric-led standard care was stated for only one study in the review. Kenny et al. 1994 identified cost savings of AUS $29 in the antenatal period for women who received the midwifery team model from a stratified sub-set of high-risk pregnant woman within a mixed risk sample of 446 women. One systematic review relevant to the UK context, Ryan et al. (2013), applied sensitivity analysis to include women of all risk categories. Where risk ratio for overall fetal/neonatal death was systematically varied based on the 95% confidence interval of 0.79 to 1.09 from pooled studies, the aggregate annual net monetary benefit for continuity of midwifery care ranged extremely widely from an estimated gain of £472 million to a loss of £202 million. Net health benefit ranged from an annual gain of 15 723 QALYs to a loss of 6 738 QALYs. All other studies in this review reported cost savings narratively or within mixed risk samples where risk stratification was not clearly stated or related to the midwifery team model only. CONCLUSIONS: Studies that measure the cost of continuity of midwifery care for women with complex pregnancy across the childbearing continuum are limited and apply inconsistent methods of economic evaluation. The cost and outcomes of implementing continuity of midwifery care for women with complex pregnancy is an important issue that requires further investigation. Robust cost-effectiveness evidence is essential to inform decision makers, to implement sustainable systems change in comparative maternity models for pregnant women at risk and to address health inequity.

Breastfeeding initiation and support: A literature review of what women value and the impact of early discharge.

PROBLEM: Early discharge following birth has become an emerging phenomenon in many countries. It is likely early discharge has an impact on the establishment of breastfeeding. OBJECTIVE: To critically appraise the evidence on what women value in relation to breastfeeding initiation and support, and investigate the impact early discharge can have on these values. METHOD: A literature search was conducted for publications since 2005 using the following databases: Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Medline, Scopus and PsycINFO; 21 primary articles were selected and included in the review. FINDINGS: There is no standard definition for 'early discharge' worldwide. Due to inconsistent definitions worldwide and minimal literature using a 24h definition, research defining early discharge as up to 72h postpartum is included. Seven key factors in relation to breastfeeding initiation and support following early discharge were identified, namely trust and security, consistent advice, practical breastfeeding support, breastfeeding education, comfortable environment, positive attitudes and emotional support, and individualised care. CONCLUSION: The findings suggest individualised postnatal lengths of stay may be beneficial for the initiation of breastfeeding. Five values were not impacted by early discharge, but rather individual midwives' practice. There is consensus in the literature that early discharge promoted a comfortable environment to support breastfeeding initiation. Wide variations in the definition of early postnatal discharge made it difficult to draw influential conclusions. Therefore, further research is required.